Laws have no power in themselves. They are subject to interpretation. Their power lies within the wills and drives behind their use each time. The nationalist drive results in an instrumental, and thereby intrinsically hypocritical use: the law is but the laws of chess, the laws of an epistemological disposition linked to the nature of the nation-state form. This drive tends to overcrowd the human sense of community and mutual support. It owes to an epistemological disposition linked to the nature of the nation-state form.
Even in the failure of manufactured consent, the public appears ill-positioned against this drive making opposition far too slow. The money isnt there, the organisation is too ah-hoc to compete with lobbies such as IPAC: At best, we may hope for a generational change taking up at least two or three generations and even this is doubtful. One among many indicators of this is the following:
Youtube: Siege to Genocide: Gaza’s history from 2005–2025 | Muhammad Shahada | UNAPOLOGETIC. We must demand and research the legal instruments for an end to the space of lies at the UN. (Veto powers have become anachronistic once the then underdeveloped countries have reached maturity).
When the difference between lies and truths becomes unworkable, the law needs a novel mechanism to identify will, intent, behind the words uttered in front of it. As precedent, the condition of intent behind the legal definition of genocide.
Trump changes his version of stories as often as the wind changes direction. 🙄 🤣. As long as he's the center of attention, he'll keep the drama going imho,( and then he changes the storyline again when a drama gets too hot to handle😉)
"Teflon Don" he is,... for better or worse😂
- Epstein is his only hiccup with this strategy. The story that won't go away 😱😱 Oops!
Looks like someone is trying very hard to make it go away at least for some time. The assassination of Charlie Kirk was not crazy Left wing amateur job. It was a precision shot with a 100% thought out get away, leaving a patsy behind who was dressed like the shooter on the roof.
Mu guess is that it was a combination of CIA and Mossad, knowing full well that the blame would fall on the Democrats and they may even find a fall guy they charge to satisfy the masses.
Mr. Kirk was killed by a shot to the neck. The shooter was either 4-5 inches low on his head shot, or 6+ inches high on his chest shot. At approximately 150 yards.
It was effective, but not necessarily a mark of marksmanship.
Not sure who. Some kind of "deep state" affiliation most likely. And both parties are involved in the "deep state" , (as puppets rather than puppeteers. ).
CK was also close to Trump and probably crossed a line too far for the deep state puppeters' liking. That scared Trump I suspect. It may even have been a "warning shot" to Trump hinself? Who knows?
Lol of course not. The real news is the other way around. Hopefully it will bring arabs to their senses not to rely on US for their defence. Seems like with the Pak alliances forming very quickly this is where it's heading.
“Perhaps this episode will force Trump to recognize the folly of outsourcing American policy in the Middle East to Israel.”
Not a chance. They’re working together
He's too inexperienced in foreign policy. And too arrogant to really care.
Our standing can’t get any lower. We elected Trump
This is all show. They planned this.
Laws have no power in themselves. They are subject to interpretation. Their power lies within the wills and drives behind their use each time. The nationalist drive results in an instrumental, and thereby intrinsically hypocritical use: the law is but the laws of chess, the laws of an epistemological disposition linked to the nature of the nation-state form. This drive tends to overcrowd the human sense of community and mutual support. It owes to an epistemological disposition linked to the nature of the nation-state form.
Even in the failure of manufactured consent, the public appears ill-positioned against this drive making opposition far too slow. The money isnt there, the organisation is too ah-hoc to compete with lobbies such as IPAC: At best, we may hope for a generational change taking up at least two or three generations and even this is doubtful. One among many indicators of this is the following:
Youtube: Siege to Genocide: Gaza’s history from 2005–2025 | Muhammad Shahada | UNAPOLOGETIC. We must demand and research the legal instruments for an end to the space of lies at the UN. (Veto powers have become anachronistic once the then underdeveloped countries have reached maturity).
When the difference between lies and truths becomes unworkable, the law needs a novel mechanism to identify will, intent, behind the words uttered in front of it. As precedent, the condition of intent behind the legal definition of genocide.
Trump changes his version of stories as often as the wind changes direction. 🙄 🤣. As long as he's the center of attention, he'll keep the drama going imho,( and then he changes the storyline again when a drama gets too hot to handle😉)
"Teflon Don" he is,... for better or worse😂
- Epstein is his only hiccup with this strategy. The story that won't go away 😱😱 Oops!
Looks like someone is trying very hard to make it go away at least for some time. The assassination of Charlie Kirk was not crazy Left wing amateur job. It was a precision shot with a 100% thought out get away, leaving a patsy behind who was dressed like the shooter on the roof.
Mu guess is that it was a combination of CIA and Mossad, knowing full well that the blame would fall on the Democrats and they may even find a fall guy they charge to satisfy the masses.
Mr. Kirk was killed by a shot to the neck. The shooter was either 4-5 inches low on his head shot, or 6+ inches high on his chest shot. At approximately 150 yards.
It was effective, but not necessarily a mark of marksmanship.
Not sure who. Some kind of "deep state" affiliation most likely. And both parties are involved in the "deep state" , (as puppets rather than puppeteers. ).
CK was also close to Trump and probably crossed a line too far for the deep state puppeters' liking. That scared Trump I suspect. It may even have been a "warning shot" to Trump hinself? Who knows?
Could Epstein files have anything to do with US actions in that region?
Lol of course not. The real news is the other way around. Hopefully it will bring arabs to their senses not to rely on US for their defence. Seems like with the Pak alliances forming very quickly this is where it's heading.
American diplomacy is in shambles; it may never recover.
He won't.